Harvard University centralises summer programme deadlines under new funding office

Harvard University Harvard College has introduced a new, centralised system for summer funding and programme applications, a move that aims to bring order and equity to a process that students have long described as fragmented. According to The Harvard Crimson, the change is being implemented through the newly created Summer Funding Opportunities Office (SFO). Until last year, Harvard-sponsored summer activities — including internships, research roles and study abroad programmes — followed separate application timelines. Each department set its own deadlines and decision dates, often leaving students juggling multiple offers and unclear funding outcomes. Under the new system, all Harvard-sponsored summer opportunities are grouped into three common application rounds, each with standardised deadlines and coordinated decision dates. Three-round system explained As reported by The Harvard Crimson, Round A decisions will be released on February 20, and students will have three days to accept or decline their offers. If funding remains unclaimed, additional offers may be made between February 24 and February 27. The final deadline to accept Round A funding is March 2. Round A mainly includes funding for Harvard-run study abroad courses and travel programmes approved by the Office of International Education. Round B, which covers several research opportunities, internships and language-based study abroad programmes, will release decisions on a rolling basis over a two-week period in March. Round C decisions will be released on a rolling basis in April. Once a student accepts funding in any round, they become ineligible for consideration in later rounds, a rule that has raised concerns among some students. Students express concern over limited flexibility Several students told The Harvard Crimson that the new policy could force difficult choices. Accepting an early offer may mean giving up the chance to apply for later opportunities that better match career goals or interests. Students described the system as more strategic, with some saying they now have to carefully assess which opportunities to apply for and when. Others pointed out that study abroad options appear earlier than many internships, making decisions more complex. Despite these concerns, some students acknowledged that the previous system was confusing and hard to track, especially for first-year applicants navigating summer planning for the first time. Push for fairness and better use of funds Harvard officials say the goal of the new system is to create clarity and fairness. SFO Director Leanne C. Gaffney Rowe told The Harvard Crimson that the structured rounds are meant to help students think more intentionally about their summer plans and avoid deadline clashes. Students supporting the change said the earlier system often resulted in unused funds sitting with departments too late to be redistributed. With a coordinated process, unclaimed funding can now be redirected to other students who may need it. College spokesperson Jonathan Palumbo encouraged students with concerns to reach out directly to the Summer Funding Opportunities Office. Bigger takeaway for students While the new model reduces flexibility, it brings predictability and transparency to a process that many students previously found scattered. As summer planning intensifies, Harvard students now face a clearer — though more strategic — path to securing funding.With inputs from The Harvard Crimson. End of Article