Multi-asset funds outperform but do they still fit your portfolio?

Multi-asset allocation funds have delivered around 15.82 percent returns over the past year, outperforming pure equity large-cap funds, which returned 5.47 percent, while long-duration debt funds declined 2.40 percent. The category, which blends equity, debt and gold, has also outpaced other hybrid strategies over the same period. Dynamic asset allocation funds, which allow fund managers to actively adjust equity and debt exposure based on market conditions, returned 4.21 percent, while aggressive hybrid funds delivered 5.64 percent.

The divergence comes even as markets showed signs of recovery on April 8, with Indian equity indices ending on a strong note. The Sensex rose 3.95 percent to close at 77,562.90, while the Nifty gained 3.78 percent to settle around the 24,000 mark.

Despite the rebound, equity markets have remained under pressure in recent months, even as gold has surged over the last one year. This has raised a key question: are multi-asset funds benefiting from active allocation across asset classes, or simply riding favourable trends in gold?

In FY26 the Nifty has declined around 2 percent, while gold has surged nearly 60 percent, underscoring the sharp divergence between the two asset classes.

This isn’t unusual. Traditionally viewed as a hedge against economic and political uncertainty, gold has tended to outperform during periods of equity stress, from the 2008 financial crisis and the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Multi-asset allocation funds, which combine equity, debt and gold within a single portfolio, are drawing attention as a way to navigate conflicting market signals. But whether they offer a better risk-adjusted entry point in the current environment, or simply reflect the tailwinds of recent asset trends, remains an open question.

Why are multi-asset funds in focus?

At a time when equities are volatile, diversification through a single product is drawing renewed interest.

“Buying gold at peak levels can dilute returns, but when gold is a small portion of an actively managed multi-asset portfolio, it often enhances diversification rather than hurting it,” says Niharika Tripathi, Head of Products & Research, Wealthy.in.

Most multi-asset funds maintain a diversified allocation across equity, debt and gold, adjusting exposures as valuations shift rather than holding fixed weights.

“When equity is under pressure and gold is expensive, the fund naturally tilts toward relatively cheaper equity and caps gold exposure, so investors are not effectively buying gold at its peak,” adds Tripathi.

Do multi-asset funds balance downside protection and upside returns?

Industry experts say the core appeal of multi-asset funds lies in their ability to smooth returns across market cycles, with gains from one asset class offsetting weakness in another.

“During difficult periods, multi-asset portfolios have historically seen smaller drawdowns than pure equity, while still delivering better outcomes than fully de-risked debt portfolios,” explains Tripathi.

However, this diversification also limits participation in strong market recoveries.

Shweta Rajani, Mutual Fund Head, Anand Rathi Wealth says, “When markets recover, multi-asset funds may underperform pure equity funds, as their equity exposure is typically limited to around 55-60 percent. This can constrain upside participation during strong equity rallies.”

Evaluating fund manager performance

The recent outperformance of multi-asset funds also raises questions about the source of returns.

“In volatile periods, returns can be supported by exposure to assets like gold rather than purely by allocation skill. Investors should look beyond point-to-point returns and evaluate performance across cycles, including rolling returns and downside capture relative to blended benchmarks.” adds Tripathi.

This makes multi-asset funds harder to assess compared to pure equity strategies, where stock selection plays a more direct role in driving returns.

Who should consider multi-asset funds?

Multi-asset funds are often positioned as a one-stop diversification solution, but their relevance depends on an investor’s existing portfolio.

“Investors with smaller investment amounts may benefit from the built-in diversification and professional management these funds offer,” says Rajani.

However, for investors who already hold a mix of equity funds, debt instruments and gold, the benefit may be limited.

“For investors who already have diversified exposure, adding a multi-asset fund does not introduce a new asset class, it simply repackages the same exposure,” points out Tripathi.

Does gold always provide protection in these portfolios?

There is a risk in assuming that gold will consistently provide downside protection.

“Gold is not a one-way hedge and can see sharp corrections after strong rallies, driven by factors such as interest rates, dollar strength and profit booking,” said Tripathi.

This means multi-asset funds are not just about diversification, they also require investors to accept volatility across all components, including gold.

Rajani explains, “Investors who assume gold will always act as a cushion may find such allocations misaligned with their expectations. In portfolios that already include equity, debt and gold exposures separately, adding a multi-asset fund can also lead to overlap, potentially diluting asset allocation and adding an extra layer of cost.”

Conclusion

Multi-asset funds are less about timing individual asset classes and more about delegating allocation decisions.

They can help manage volatility and simplify diversification, but may offer limited incremental value for investors who already maintain a well-diversified portfolio independently.