Can buying a house be a bad investment? Expert sparks viral real estate investment debate

A social media thread by CA Nitin Kaushik has reignited the debate around whether buying a home in India is truly a wealth-creating investment or simply an emotional purchase disguised as an asset.

In a detailed post on X, Kaushik argued that many homeowners overestimate the actual returns generated from residential apartments after accounting for hidden costs such as stamp duty, maintenance charges, property taxes and inflation.

“Your home is a liquidity trap disguised as an asset,” Kaushik wrote, adding that many people mistake nominal price appreciation for real wealth creation.

The real return calculation

Kaushik explained the concept using a hypothetical example of a flat purchased for Rs 80 lakh in 2015 that is currently valued at around Rs 1.2 crore.

According to him, once additional costs such as 6% stamp duty, society maintenance expenses and annual property taxes are included, the effective acquisition and holding cost rises closer to Rs 95 lakh.

He argued that the increase from Rs 95 lakh to Rs 1.2 crore over a decade translates into an annualised return of only around 2.3%, which is lower than long-term inflation in India.

“In real terms, your purchasing power actually shrank,” he noted, suggesting that homeowners may feel wealthier on paper while failing to generate meaningful inflation-adjusted returns.

MUST READ: Should you take a home loan in a high-interest economy?

MUST READ: New tax rules 2026: What it means for your house buying plans, portfolio allocation

Equity markets

The thread also compared residential property returns with equity market performance over the same period.

Kaushik claimed that if the same Rs 80 lakh had been invested in a Nifty 50 index fund in 2015, the investment could have grown to over Rs 2.2 crore by 2026, significantly outperforming the apartment investment.

He described the difference as the “opportunity cost” of locking capital into residential real estate with limited liquidity and recurring expenses.

The comments have resonated strongly online, particularly among younger investors increasingly favouring equity mutual funds, index investing and financial assets over traditional property ownership.

MUST READ: Home loan at 25? Should a 25-year-old take a Rs 30 lakh joint home loan or focus on liquidity, investments?

Apartments vs land

Kaushik further argued that apartments behave like depreciating assets because buildings deteriorate over time and require continuous spending on repairs, maintenance and upgrades.

“The building starts rotting the day you move in,” he wrote, claiming that investors are effectively paying for “dead square footage” that steadily loses value.

Instead, he advocated investing in land parcels located in emerging growth corridors, citing lower holding costs and stronger long-term appreciation potential.

According to his example, a plot bought for Rs 80 lakh and later valued at Rs 3.5 crore would generate a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 15.8%.

He also pointed out that land ownership remains finite and cannot be diluted, unlike apartment projects where developers may add additional floors or towers over time.

MUST READ: Buying a house with your spouse? Here’s how it can reduce your tax bill

Emotional value

Despite his criticism of residential apartments as investments, Kaushik clarified that buying a home for self-use is entirely valid.

“If you need a roof over your head, buy one,” he said, while cautioning people against justifying large EMIs by assuming automatic wealth creation.

The viral discussion has once again highlighted the changing mindset among urban Indian investors, many of whom are increasingly evaluating assets based on liquidity, inflation-adjusted returns and long-term CAGR rather than traditional notions of homeownership.