Despite record production and strong earnings, Hindustan Zinc has lagged behind the Nifty Metal Index, weighed down by concerns over Vedanta’s debt. But is there still a silver lining for investors?
Hindustan Zinc: Fundamentals intact, but is the stock worth the risk?
A flurry of developments at Vedanta Group’s crown jewel, Hindustan Zinc, has left investors and analysts divided. Over the past 16 months, this traditionally low-volatility stock has seen a rollercoaster ride.
On the global front, Trump tariffs and geopolitical tensions have increased silver and zinc prices. On the domestic front, infrastructure development has boosted demand for zinc. On the operations front, the company is firing all smelters, running at 93% capacity, and breaking production records. Hindustan Zinc reported its second-highest revenue and net profit in FY25, following a record year in FY23.
Despite this, its stock price has dipped 46% from its all-time high of Rs 807.70 on 22 May 2024. The stock underperformed the Nifty Metal Index, rising 132% in 5 years as against the 347% rally in the Index.
Story continues below this ad
5-Year Stock Price Momentum of Hindustan Zinc and Nifty Metal Index
Source: Trading View Source: Trading View
Hindustan Zinc is among the top five silver producers in the world, and the only company that produces silver from primary sources. But its stock reported tepid growth even when silver prices reached a new lifetime high of over Rs 1.15 lakh per kg on July 14.
What is preventing the stock from rallying?
The organisational structure of Hindustan Zinc
At the heart of investors’ concerns is Hindustan Zinc’s ownership structure. UK-based Vedanta Resources (VRL) holds a 56.38% stake in Vedanta Ltd (VDL). VDL holds a 63.42% stake in Hindustan Zinc. VRL has been deleveraging its balance sheet, which accumulated debt over the years from several failed acquisitions. Hindustan Zinc became the crown jewel of VDL as it was debt-free and had strong cash reserves.
In May 2024, VDL’s subsidiary Vedanta Semiconductors raised Rs 1,804 crore in secured debt from private creditors by pledging Hindustan Zinc shares. Vedanta Semiconductors gave a two-year unsecured inter-corporate loan to VDL, which the latter used to repay debt and pay brand fees to its holding company, VRL.
Story continues below this ad
Multiple such transactions shifted VRL’s loan to VDL. In FY23, metal stocks had a fantastic year with a cyclical rally and robust profits. As the largest shareholder, VDL has the power to decide the dividend amount of Hindustan Zinc. VDL decided to use the money locked in Hindustan Zinc’s reserves by issuing dividends.
Hindustan Zinc’s Dividends, Reserves, and Borrowings (FY 21-FY25)
Particulars Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24 Mar-25 Reserves (Rs Crore) 31,468 33,437 12,097 14,388 12,445 Dividend payment (Rs Crore) -15,972 -7,606 -31,901 -5,493 -12,253 Borrowings (Rs Crore) 7,201 2,844 11,881 8,722 10,964 Cash 9,376 5,763 1,412 173 175
In FY23, Hindustan Zinc paid Rs 31,901 crore in dividends alone, which reduced its reserves by 64% to Rs 12,097 crore. These reserves are used to fund growth projects and give long-term returns to shareholders. VDL, as a shareholder, had the right to claim the reserves. But this reduced the company’s capacity to self-fund expansion.
Hindustan Zinc’s rising debt
Hindustan Zinc had to borrow money to meet its capital expenditure requirements. FY23 dividend converted the net cash company into a net debt company. While its debt-to-equity ratio remains below 1.0, the loss of reserves has weakened its balance sheet.
Significant debt is a concern for metals and mining companies. They sell their output on the commodity prices, which are determined by market forces. They can only control the cost of production (CoP). Keeping debt low helps the company sustain a period of low prices and stay profitable. So far, Hindustan Zinc’s debt is sustainable as the high price of zinc and silver and low CoP have increased the company’s profits and operating cash flow.
Story continues below this ad
However, Hindustan Zinc’s share price has declined, at least partly, due to a decrease in equity reserves over the last three years.
Hindustan Zinc’s Book Value Per Share From August 2020 to April 2025
Source: Screener.in Source: Screener.in
Promoters offload stake
Hindustan Zinc’s promoters have been offloading stake after halving the reserve.
The Government of India offloaded a 1.6% stake in November 2024 through offer for sale (OFS) for Rs 3,449 crore, reducing its stake to 27.92% from 29.54%.
VDL sold a 1.6% stake in Hindustan Zinc on June 18, 2025, at a 10% discount for Rs 3,028 crore to deleverage its balance sheet and support its demerger into 5 entities.
Amidst this, Hindustan Zinc CEO Arun Misra’s proposal to demerge the zinc and silver business was rejected by the Ministry of Mines. Misra, however, believes that demerging the precious metals segment will be value accretive, as Hindustan Zinc is India’s only listed silver producer.
Story continues below this ad
This restructuring and reduction of reserves have limited the stock’s upside potential.
Should long-term investors be concerned?
Hindustan Zinc is the second-largest integrated zinc manufacturer in the world. It has one of the lowest CoP at $1,055 per tonne (in FY25). As commodities are bought and sold in dollars, a strengthening of the dollar increases rupee cash flow.
All three factors — higher commodity prices, depreciating rupee, and lower CoP — were in Hindustan Zinc’s favour, which helped it report an Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) margin of 51% in FY25.
Factors Affecting Hindustan Zinc’s EBITDA
Source: Hindustan Zinc Q4 FY2025 Earnings Presentation Source: Hindustan Zinc Q4 FY2025 Earnings Presentation
Its revenue surged 18%, EBITDA 28%, and profit after tax 33% in FY25. It reported its second-highest free cash flow before capital expenditure (capex) of Rs 13,784 crore.
Story continues below this ad
Hindustan Zinc is growing its production by 3-4% annually through operational improvements, which it believes could generate Rs 50,000 crore free cash flow pre-capex in five years. It now aims to double its production capacity from 1.13 million tons per annum (mmtpa) to 2 mmtpa in the long term as steel demand increases. It announced the first phase of this expansion, under which it will add 250,000 mtpa capacity over the next three years.
Hindustan Zinc is basing its expansion on India’s ambitious plan to achieve 300 mmtpa of steel production in the next 2-3 years.
It expects the phase 1 expansion of Rs 12,000 crore to generate Rs 40,000 crore revenue and Rs 21,000 crore EBITDA.
Hindustan Zinc’s Earnings Expectations from Phase 1 Expansion
Year Revenue (Rs Crore) EBITDA (Rs Crore) FY25 34,100 17,465 After Phase 1 completion in FY28* 40,000- 42,000 21,000
Source: Hindustan Zinc Q4FY25 earnings
Story continues below this ad
With a Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) of 58%, growth capex should be welcome news. Capacity expansion could lead to higher EBITDA and free cash flow, helping it service debt and rebuild equity reserves, thereby increasing its enterprise value.
The capacity expansion is projected to increase Hindustan Zinc’s capacity to produce silver. At 1.2 mmtpa, the company produces 750 tons of silver. If the company reaches 2 mmtpa capacity, it could produce 1,200-1,300 tons of silver. The company is also implementing innovative technology at one smelter, which, if successful, could recover an additional 27 mtpa of silver and 6,000 mtpa of lead from the smelter waste without burning. The increasing mix of precious metals could help the company boost profits.
These long-term growth drivers are being offset by short-term uncertainty around dividend policies and the parent company’s demerger and deleveraging.
What analysts have to say
Analysts have mixed ratings on Hindustan Zinc. JM Financial is bullish on Hindustan Zinc for its low CoP, high-grade, long-life captive mines, and its ability to scale. Even Motilal Oswal is optimistic about the zinc producer’s expansion plans, but believes that the market has already priced in the positives.
Analyst Ratings on Hindustan Zinc
Story continues below this ad
Brokerage Hindustan Zinc Target Price (Rs) Difference from Current Market Price Rs 437.2 Rating Motilal Oswal 480 10% Neutral Nuvama 403 -8% Reduce JM Financial 550 26% Buy Philip Capital 526 20% Buy Antique Broking 489 12% Hold
Source: Brokerage Reports
Nuvama has a ‘Reduce’ call on Hindustan Zinc. It stated that expansion will facilitate long-term growth, but commodity prices could affect near-term earnings, making the stock’s valuation expensive till then.
The miner’s valuation is determined by enterprise value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA). While the capacity expansion and cost efficiencies are growing its EBITDA, high dividend payouts, which result in lower cash, and therefore higher debt, are potentially impacting overall valuations. The company’s current EV/EBITDA is 10.7x, higher than its 5-year median of 9.0x, and double that of Vedanta’s 5.65x.
Conclusion
Adding to the volatility, US-based Viceroy Research took a short position against VRL’s debt, alleging that the Vedanta Group is on the “brink of insolvency.” Vedanta Group has denied the claims, calling them a “malicious combination of selective misinformation and baseless allegations to discredit the group”. This controversy could keep Hindustan Zinc’s share price volatile in the short term.
Story continues below this ad
However, Hindustan Zinc’s strategic capital discipline, strong fundamentals, leaner cost base, and leadership in the fourth most widely used metal (zinc) make it a resilient stock that could continue paying dividends.
Note: We have relied on data from http://www.Screener.in throughout this article. Only in cases where the data was not available, have we used an alternate, but widely used and accepted source of information.
Puja Tayal is a financial writer with over 17 years of experience in the field of fundamental research.
Disclosure: The writer and his dependents do not hold the stocks discussed in this article.
The website managers, its employee(s), and contributors/writers/authors of articles have or may have an outstanding buy or sell position or holding in the securities, options on securities or other related investments of issuers and/or companies discussed therein. The content of the articles and the interpretation of data are solely the personal views of the contributors/ writers/authors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific objectives, resources and only after consulting such independent advisors as may be necessary.